This session was grueling: first, because illness decimated our ranks. Thisj was laid low for the three-day session with bronchitis and Friday morning Josh was hospitalised briefly. For the rest of us nominally healthy ones, Wednesday through Friday was an endurance march.
Wednesday
We convened at the Confluence Technology Center Wednesday afternoon and my husband Mark (Class XXV) gave a few introductory remarks to the class about the partnerships formed to construct the CTC. Afterwards, we toured the Chelan PUD's operations center (a string that Mark pulled on our behalf) and, if we can hold onto the information, may well help us next year when we examine the Columbia River system. He departed for a full week of his own, and Dr Glen Klock (Class II) talked about his work with Ag-Base, selling Washington products over the Internet. He hopes to establish MySpace-type pages for ag businesses to sell directly to the consumer.
After lunch, we divided into two groups to give our five-minute speeches, utilising the technology at the CTC to videotape each classmate. Note to self: when did I get so middle-aged and so fat?? Andrea (Class XV) and Vicky (Class X) were our evaluators. Andrea was very kind to us, offering both positive reinforcement and gentle suggestions for improvement.
I'd rehearsed mine many times and was comfortable with the topic, but chose to use my notes at the podium (which we were all required to stand behind, owing to the pressure-sensitive mat which focussed the camera on the speaker) and found the notes to be somewhat of a crutch. I did far better the next day when I left the notes in my book and just went for it!
My classmates all chose interesting and thought-provoking topics—even those who I knew had drafted theirs the night before! Not everyone was comfortable speaking, but everyone came from an issue or experience that they could be passionate about.
After the evaluations, we walked to the
Wenatchee World offices and Rufus (Class XXIV) threw a nice little reception, showed the class a video of the paper, and talked about the generations of leadership his own family had provided.
I'd made reservations for us to eat at the Roaster, and poor Thisj had called the restaurant to order us all a round of drinks, so Steve took the initiative to send him a balloon bouquet Thursday, which we were told touched him very much. At dinner, David surprised us all be reading several funny quotes that he'd copied down in Pullman last month. Some of them were hilarious, and if this keeps up, we could well write a book at the end of two years (though we might be the only audience to fully appreciate it!
Thursday
I slept soundly that night, but my own otherwise healthy body wasn't ready for the alarm: I woke at 06:30 and drove down to the Center at about 7:30, threading my way in through all the Festival of Trees Christmas crap (don't get me STARTED on American Christmas traditions!). From 8:00 to 12:00 we gave our speeches once again for the entire group (many much improved, including myself) and broke for lunch. During lunch we voted to winnow down all the topics to the top five which would form the nucleus of our public policy work teams. Considering the difficulty, this went fairly quickly.
Here are the five projects and the teams (as it stands now)
Consumer Awareness Ad Campaign
Immigration Reform
- Shawn
- Derek
- Juan
- Rachel
- Stephanie
Transfer of Development Rights
- Orv
- Grant
- David
- Sarah
- Jennifer
Partnership between Environmentalists & Farmers
Wildfire Policy
My group chose me to serve as temporary chair of our group until we meet again in Spokane. Once we meet again, we'll need to allow Thisj a chance to choose a group, and that might mean some reshuffling. He's a smart guy; it was very unfortunate that he was deprived of the chance to go through this session (as we were deprived of his contributions) but I am sure he will be able to get up to speed when he recovers.
After lunch, Ellen gave the first part of her lecture on working effectively with others, then her friend Liv led a session on nonviolent communications. I'm sure that there is value to the subject, however. I (and perhaps others) were so tired after the mental anxiety of the speech session) that I struggled mightily to remain engaged. If Liv hadn't gotten us up for a couple of exercises, I probably would have curled up in the corner and snored.
Last on the agenda Thursday afternoon was a panel discussion with Russ (Class XI) and Sarah on the process of establishing the Entiat Watershed Plan. Again, I suspect many of us struggled to give them our full attention. Please. Must. Sleep!
Thank the gods, a break at last, and Rhonda, Ginny and I walked down the Avenue to Palmer shoes, so Rhonda could replace her beloved and worn-out Halflinger clogs. The fresh cool air was a tonic, much-needed, before we returned to the bowels of the Center for the alumni reception. Jennifer said Friday as we were reflecting on key learnings that networking was the last thing on her mind, however, she established a key contact with Ron (Class XVII) which will be of real benefit to her. The value of the networking sessions cannot be overstated, for often they are the most lasting benefits of the Ag-Forestry program. It was nice to see Erin (Class XXIX) again, and she gave me her Washington DC tour book and introduced me to her husband.
Our dinner speaker, nicely introduced by Rachel, was Jon Wyss, Government Affairs Director at Gebbers Farms. Jon's topic was immigration reform, already eloqently illustrated in Rachel's five-minute speech, but there was much to consider about the problems we face if the nation does not effect meaningful reform.
Friday
I'll just sleep when I'm dead...actually, I slept better, but still was feeling an energy deficit as I downed my coffee and headed off for another full day. We assembled in our new policy groups and Ellen led us through more exercises on working effectively, including a pretty funny role-playing process where we each were required to take on the positions of special interests and hammer together some ground rules for a fictional watershed planning process. Poor Shawn: he was chosen to facilitate and we were brutal to him; he wanted to give up halfway through! It was a valuable exercise, though.
We broke for lunch and dined with the board (outgoing and incoming members) and I had an interesting conversation with Trustee Terry Gilmore, a forestry consultant. We enjoyed a nice pep-talk from Court, (Class XXI) the incoming president. After lunch, we reflected on some of the key learnings from the three days and Clay gave us a glimpse of the media seminar which will be in *gulp* three weeks. We've also looked ahead, a tiny bit, to the Washington DC trip.
As eager as I was to finish for the day, I felt a bit sorry to see everyone go. We're a wonderful group. I cannot wait to see where we take ourselves next, so long as we can survive the fun. I'll probably need every minute of the next three weeks to rest up!